A. On October 30, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for disclosure of the details of budget and use of expenses for specific duties, including receipts for the strengthening of criminal investigation capacity, from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2014, including receipts for the details of budget and use of expenses for on-site investigation activities from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2014, ③ the details of budget and use of administrative expenses from January 1, 2014, ④ the details of budget and use of administrative expenses from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 201, ⑤ the head of a police station’s budget and use of expenses for specific duties from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2014.

(hereinafter referred to as "each information by sequence above"). (b)

On November 6, 2014, the Defendant responded to the Plaintiff that the information in each of the above information is being disclosed on the website of the Seocho Police Station, and rendered a disposition rejecting the disclosure of information for the following reasons with respect to the remaining information (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

(1) Article 9 (1) 5 and 6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (where an investigation expense, specific subject matter, details, etc. of expenditure are clarified, it is difficult to achieve administrative purposes, including the personal information of public officials in the budget payment details). (4) There is no relevant budget details at the Information Police Station described in paragraphs (1). [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant’s non-disclosure ground was lawful is difficult, or the Defendant’s explanation of its specific grounds is insufficient, and the instant disposition should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

(b) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes.

C. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the revocation of a disposition rejecting the disclosure of information pertaining to each information listed in the separate sheet No. 1 is legitimate. 1) The Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

subsection. (3) of this section.