except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 21:42 on June 8, 2020, the Defendant reported that the victim D (Nam, 61 years of age) who is the customer was trying to take a video image as a cell phone among the disputes arising from the fry and dry field problems with the head and dry field, and caused the victim's head to take a hand-on hand, which is a dangerous object on the table, and caused the victim's head to go up one time with a hand-on hand, and caused two strings where the victim needs to take a medical treatment for about three weeks.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim by dangerous things.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Chapter I Acts and subordinate statutes to a written diagnosis of police statement concerning D;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution shall be based on the following: (a) the developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant injury; (b) the degree of danger of the Defendant’s behavior; (c) the degree of injury the victim suffered; (d) the agreement with the victim; and (e) the previous records of the Defendant’s punishment;