On June 4, 2015, at the office of “D real estate” operated by C in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. on June 4, 2015, the Defendant falsely declared the victim E through the above C that “The Defendant changed the cost of KRW 25 million by making an advance payment to reduce the construction of a detached house according to the drawing.”

However, as the Defendant did not receive money from other persons as the advance payment for the construction work and did not perform the construction work, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to perform the construction work of a detached house only because he did not receive money from the injured party and did not have any intention or ability to pay the money to other persons.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained delivery of KRW 10 million from June 6, 2016 to the Nonghyup Bank account in F’s name via C; (c) KRW 10 million from June 9, 2016; and (d) KRW 25 million from June 17, 2016 to KRW 5 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of standard contract documents and transaction details (net 3) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. 범죄사실에 대한 해당 법조 형법 제 347조 제 1 항( 포괄하여 징역형 선택) [ 양형이 유] 양형기준 : 징역 6월 ~ 1년 6월 ☞ 1억 원 미만 일반 사기 기본영역 수차례에 걸쳐 동종 범행으로 처벌 받은 전력이 있는 점, 피고인이 기본 골조공사만 진행하다가 잠적하였고, 그 기본 골조공사와 관련한 자재비나 인건비도 지급하지 아니하여 결국 피해자가 모든 공사비를 부담한 점, 아직 까지 아무런 피해 회복도 이루어지지 아니한 점, 피해자가 법정에 나와 피고인의 처벌을 강력히 희망하고 있는 점 등을 종합하되, 기록과 변론에 나타난 범행 경위, 반성태도 등 여러 정상을 아울러 참작하여 양형기준 범위 내에서 주문과 같이 형을 정함