A. The Plaintiff is a company whose purpose is the education support business, economic business, and banking business under the Banking Act of the member cooperatives. The Defendants are companies with the purpose of concluding various insurance contracts, collecting insurance premiums under the relevant contract, paying insurance proceeds, etc.

B. Around July 6, 2007, 2007, luminous Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. (1) concluded a shipbuilding contract and an advance refund guarantee contract (hereinafter “luminous Shipbuilding”) with four foreign vessel owners, including Polest Polest Pte. Ltd, respectively, to build vessels between KS-107, KS-107, KS-109, KS-110 (hereinafter “each 107”), 108, 109, 110, 110, hereinafter “10, 190,” and 19,000 US dollars per vessel; (b) around July 20, 2007, the vessel shipbuilding agreement was concluded between 19,000 U.S. vessel owner and 4 foreign vessel owner; and (c) each of the vessel’s vessel’s vessel’s vessel’s vessel’s vessel’s 10,000 U.S.A.M. 15, 205.

(2) On July 27, 2007, Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance”) entered into an advance refund guarantee contract with the terms that the above Defendant guarantees the obligation to return advance payment, in case where the luminous shipbuilding did not perform the obligation under each shipbuilding contract with respect to the vessels of 105 and 106, and thus is liable to return the advance payment received from the purchaser of each of the above vessels. The Defendant Green Damage Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Green Damage Insurance Co., Ltd.”) agreed to take over 50% of the obligation under the said advance refund guarantee contract.

(3) On August 2, 2007, the Plaintiff received advance payment from the purchaser of each of the above vessels due to the luminous shipbuilding’s failure to perform the obligation under each shipbuilding contract with respect to the vessel of 107 through 110.