However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 4, 2020, the Defendant: (a) at C convenience stores located in Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-si; (b) at C convenience stores located in Sanyang-gu, Sanyang-gu; (c) requested the victim D to take a bath for “singing” and to find goods; and (d) made it difficult for the victim to take a knife the knife; and (c) took the knife the knife; and (d) took the knife for sound display; and (d) had avoided disturbance for 20 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the investigation into police statements conducted by the defendant against D in court;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on community service and lecture attendance order is that the defendant committed the crime of this case even though he was sentenced to a fine several times due to the same kind of crime, and thus, the defendant committed the crime of this case at this time.