재물손괴등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentencing of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. The Defendant agreed with the victims of the crime of damage to property and interference with business affairs.
However, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the crime of destruction of the property of this case and was released at 2 days thereafter, and committed the crime of obstructing the business of this case and obstructing the performance of official duties.
Defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes.
In full view of the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the offense, means and consequence, etc., and the fact that there is no special circumstance or circumstance to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment, the lower court’s sentencing is not unfair.
3. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.