절도등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the overall circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is against the nature of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the two-year imprisonment), and the fact that he was receiving the psychosis and treatment due to adaptation disorder, the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant shows the perception and reflect of the crime of this case, and that the defendant was receiving negotiology and therapy due to the adaptation disorder.
However, the crime of this case was committed on July 1, 2012 by the defendant at the construction site at around 02:00, theft of KRW 800,00 in cash from the wall of the victim D, who was a dong fee that had been working at the construction site, and tried to open a door for the victim F's parked vehicle on October 2, 2012, but was sent to the police officer, and thus, the crime was committed. From August 29, 2012 to September 10, 2012, the crime of this case was committed by the victim I and was committed by 10,000 won in cash from the victim D, and was punished by imprisonment with prison labor at the same age of 10,000 won, and was punished by 10,000 won in total from the victim I, and it was also planned that the defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor at the construction site at the same age of 10,000 won and did not receive any injury from the victim.