2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

On May 28, 2015, at around 13:30, the Defendant, at around 13:30 on May 28, 2015, obstructed the said victim’s work by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, by finding the company under the influence of alcohol and drinking that the forest owned by the Defendant was accepted in relation to the construction of a golf course conducted by the said company, but the amount of compensation was low. In addition, the Defendant expressed an desire to “this rings, Chewing sark,” using loudspeakers, and seeing the cryp in the office with the victim D, etc., and entering the office with the victim D, thereby obstructing the said victim’s work by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 314 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;