도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On August 18, 2007, around 04:05, the facts charged violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency by operating the said vehicle in the condition that it is loaded with construction materials of about 11.01 tons exceeding 10 tons in excess of 10 tons in the limit limit of C freight vehicles owned by the Defendant on the road of the construction site at the point of 28.63km located in the Gyeongcheon-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Masan-Spo line, Daegu, 196 and 28.63km located in the Gyeongcheon-do, the Gyeongcheon-do, the Gyeongcheon-do Office located in Korea, and the Defendant committed such a violation with respect to the Defendant’
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005, and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), which is the legal provision applicable to the instant case, shall lose its effect retroactively to the decision of unconstitutionality of 17 July 30, 2009 by the Constitutional Court Decision 17 Constitutional Court. The decision of not guilty pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act. The summary of the Defendant’s decision shall be announced publicly pursuant to Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.