게임산업진흥에관한법률위반방조
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, as the proprietor of the “C Game Center” on the second floor in Yangsan-si, was a person who operates the said Game Center by setting up 50 game machine “Tropiers” in the said Game Center. D as the chief of the business department, in charge of the management of the said game machine and the businesses of the customers, and E and F as an employee, in charge of the exchange of broadcasts and the heart of customers.
No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.
From June 2012 to July 201 of the same year, the Defendant and D, operating the C Game in the above way, issued and delivered a receipt for storing points of KRW 10,000 per 10,000 per 10,000 with the seal of the Defendant, or a certificate for keeping points of KRW 10,000 with the seal of the Defendant, or a certificate for keeping points of KRW 20,00 with the seal of the Defendant, and conspired to facilitate money exchange among customers by impliedly using the above certificate of custody.
G around 16:00 on July 11, 2012, 2012, the G was found to be a customer in the above game room, and the other customers demanded exchange of a certificate of custody for the use and acquisition of the game product. As such, the G exchanged cash of KRW 200,000 in cash from the stairs of the above game room as stated in the certificate of custody of points. It is apparent that all the facts charged in the facts charged in 2012 are the clerical error in the “2013.” From June 1, 2012 to July 1, 2012, the G exchanged the said game to unspecified customers in the same way in the same way as the above game room, corridor or stairs.
The Defendant and D, as above, have silentd the issuance of points keeping certificates, issuance and exchange act as above in the exchange act by G, and D, with the purport that "the identification of other customers" was made by notifying the other customers of the method of exchange, as well as facilitating the exchange act of G. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 24689, Mar. 23, 2013>