However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 19, 2017, the Defendant left the victim E (50) (50) who is a substitute driver on the front of the Dhop, located in Si, Gun, Si, Gun, Si, si, si, and left the FK5 car to the Defendant’s office.

On the same day, the defendant did not pay a substitute driving fee because the victim took wrong place in the vicinity of the 23:08 meeting office, and the victim took place in the place other than the house.

While engaging in a dispute with the victim, he/she was able to do so with the victim, and he/she was able to do so, and he/she was able to see the victim's neck in front of the H convenience point located in the Gunsan-si G during the present police box. He/she was able to see the victim's neck beyond the floor, and she was frighted by the victim who was going beyond the floor.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the right-hand side 2,3,4 breadth, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer against the defendant or E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 62(1) (which takes into account the agreement with the victim) of the Criminal Act is above 62(1).