beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.11.16 2018노125

상해

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of suspended execution in April, and 80 hours of community service order) is too unreasonable, which is a summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The determination of sentencing is based on statutory penalty, and the discretionary determination is made within a reasonable and reasonable scope, taking into account the factors constituting the conditions for sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.

However, considering the unique area of sentencing of sentencing of the first instance that is respected under the principle of trial priority and the principle of direct jurisdiction taken by our criminal litigation law and the nature of the ex post facto review of the appellate court, the sentencing of sentencing of the first instance was exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion when comprehensively taking into account the factors and guidelines for sentencing specified in the first instance sentencing trial process.

In light of the records newly discovered in the course of the appellate court’s sentencing hearing, it is reasonable to file an unfair judgment of the first instance court, only in cases where it is deemed unfair to maintain the sentencing of the first instance court as it is for the court to judge the sentencing of the first instance court.

In the absence of such exceptional circumstances, it is desirable to respect the sentencing of the first instance judgment (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The circumstances alleged by the Defendant as an element favorable to the sentencing in the trial of the lower court have already been presented during the oral proceedings of the lower court, and there is no change of circumstances favorable to the sentencing criteria after the sentence of the lower court was rendered.

The defendant appears to be against the defendant while recognizing the crime of this case, and the crime of this case was committed by the defendant in the course of the victim A and his body fighting, and the defendant also suffered more severe injury, such as the victim's awareness and the frame, etc., are favorable to the defendant.

However, under the influence of alcohol, the defendant paid a trial fee to the victim A, and then assaulted the part of the neck first, thereby causing an injury.