beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.06.27 2012고단2365 (3)

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of three million won on October 24, 2012 in the Jeonju District Court's Seoul District Court's branch on October 16, 2012, with a sentence of imprisonment for special larceny, etc., and the judgment on October 24, 2012 became final and conclusive.

Defendant

A, C, and D had a certificate of personal seal impression, etc. of E and F, with the mind that they will receive loans under E and F, C received related documents from E and F, D had telephone conversations with the victim lending company, and D had the victim lending company as if they were the name of the lending company, and the Defendant A conspired to withdraw the borrowed money.

1. According to the foregoing public offering, the fabrication of private documents, the uttering of a falsified document, and fraud C received documents, such as a certificate of personal seal impression, a certified copy of resident registration, etc. from H located in Gunsan City on March 21, 2012.

Defendant

A, C, and D have forged an application for a loan under the name of E, a private document concerning rights and obligations for the purpose of exercising a “K” in the signature column after entering “K” in the column for limit on loans under the above contract form, at the J Sscam located in the Si of Kun on March 26, 2012, C printed out the form of the lending contract, and Defendant A has received KRW 1 million from the said company on March 28, 2012, by submitting the said application for the loan to arrive at the date of arrival on March 28, 2012, as if it was duly formed with the non-employee of the name of Hcam, who is aware of the forgery, by mail. The Defendant A received KRW 1 million from the said company as a loan.

2. On March 22, 2012, Defendant A, C, and D related to the lending of the Sejong Savings Bank in the name of E applied for a loan to an employee under the name of the victim Sejong Bank using documents in the name of E, which were kept in custody, in accordance with the above public offering, and D applied for a loan to an employee under the name of the victim Sejong Savings Bank, and D applied for a loan to an employee under the name of the victim as if he was E.