When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 10, 2013, around 20:50, the Defendant used the victim's face to be kneeeeed in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C Manion Adong. On July 10, 2013, the Defendant took a dispute with the victim D (the age of 43) and parking problems that are not good for each other, and assaulted the victim by taking the victim's body and bridge back to the floor continuously, taking the victim's face and bridge back to the floor, and taking the victim's face into account.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. On-site reports;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the criminal place

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Around 20:50 on July 10, 2013, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as spawn and spawn, which require treatment for about 21 days, when he/she talks with the victim D (the age of 43) who is not well-grounded in appraisal, and parking problems. In drinking, he/she continued to take part in the body and bridge of the victim beyond the floor on a hand, and took part in several occasions at the risk of face of the victim.

2. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, it is not sufficient to acknowledge that the defendant, even if he could acknowledge the facts of assaulting the victim as above, the defendant caused injury to the completeness of the victim's body or to the extent that it may cause harm to physiological function, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, according to the trial and records, ① the victim was not likely to cause serious injury due to the assault of the defendant in this court.

However, since the medical certificate needs to go to the front hospital and the hospital was issued in order to demand 400,000 won in return for the issuance, the person who was found to be in charge of the hospital.