2. The judgment of the court below is in contravention of the defendant's mistake, and there are favorable circumstances such as that the victims of each of the crimes of this case do not want the defendant's punishment. However, these circumstances appear to have been considered all at the court below, and there is no change of circumstances at the court below. Meanwhile, each of the crimes of this case is not less complicated in light of the type, frequency, and interval of the crime, and the defendant did not reach agreement with the victims of each of the larceny of this case until the court below. There are several kinds of records of punishment for the same crime of this case, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the defendant during the period of repeated crime of the same kind. In addition, considering the motive and circumstance leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, character, and environment after the crime of this case was committed, the sentencing of the court below is too unfair. Thus, the above defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.