Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On October 2012, the Defendant, without obtaining approval from the competent authority at a place where it is impossible to identify a location below the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Merodong, installed the light equipment of the above vehicle with a HID inside a B Spp motor vehicle owned by the Defendant, and changed the light equipment of the above vehicle from around the above day to December 20 of the same year.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police officer;

1. Notice of detection (List 3), and the ledger of motor vehicle registration (list 5);

1. Application of photograph (List 4) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant laws and the former Automobile Management Act (wholly amended by Act No. 12217, Jan. 7, 2014); Article 81 Subparag. 19, Article 34 (Amendment); Article 81 Subparag. 20, and Article 34 of the same Act concerning criminal facts; and each fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not extend to a period of operation, unless the confession, reflection, initial crime, or modification is significant.