However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and the victim C ( South, 24 years old) are workplace clubs, and they are living together in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

그런 데, 피고인은 2017. 12. 19. 03:00 경 서울 양천구 목동 동로 257에 있는 현대 백화점 목동점 앞 노상에서, 술자리를 마치고 귀가하던 중 알 수 없는 이유로 피해자와 다투다가 피해자를 손으로 밀어 넘어뜨리고 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때리고, 피해자의 머리를 잡고 바닥에 수회 찧고 이후 출동한 경찰관에 의해 피해자와 같이 위 D로 옮겨 졌다.

After that, the Defendant, in front of the new wall 9th century, inflicted injury on the victim by walking the victim's head, streke, streke, and streke, etc. from several times, resulting in approximately four weeks of medical treatment, such as cutting off the body streke and the body streke (closed) of the body streke.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect C and a written statement of C related to the police;

1. Report on internal investigation (verification of CCTV for the purpose of committing a crime), photographs (a screen by cutting down CCTV for the purpose of a crime); 1. Report on internal investigation (verification of 112 reported details), report on internal investigation (in the case of a shot-112 reporter), and report on internal investigation (in the case of a shot-in the case of a shot-in company)

1. Report on internal investigation ( acceptance of the contents of the Kakao Stockholm conversation), photographs (the contents of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of an injury diagnostic certificate and diagnostic certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order (such as suspension of execution, etc.) is the case in which the defendant harshly sought the victim without any particular reason, and the criminal nature is not good in light of the motive of the crime, the content and method of the crime.

The degree of injury suffered by the victim is not easy, but has not been recovered from damage.

These points are disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant is against the defendant while making a confession of all crimes, and there is no criminal conviction against the defendant.