However, as to the defendants, the period of one year from the day when this judgment became final and conclusive.

On March 19, 2016, at around 04:50 on March 19, 2016, the Defendants were in dispute on the ground that Defendant B did not take the personnel management of Defendant B while drinking together within the “D” restaurant located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and Defendant B did not take the part in the personnel management of Defendant B.

1. Defendant A, at the above date and time and place, the horses of the victim B (n, 37 years old) are unbured, and was consigned to the victim’s face, and the empty cup, which is a dangerous object, was placed in the victim’s face, and the victim took dangerous things in line with the right upper part of the end of the part of the woman’s face and carried the victim with approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B asserted against the victim A (the 50-year old age) at the above date and time, and at the same place, Defendant B sustained the beer World Cup, which is a dangerous thing, with the victim’s face, and caused the loss, etc. to teared by the victim due to the victim’s lab. Defendant B laid the victim of other empty beer World Cup, which is a dangerous thing. Defendant B sustained the victim with dangerous things and sustained the victim by carrying the dangerous things, and caused the victim’s injury, such as dump dump, which requires two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the said Act for mitigation of a small amount of punishment (the following favorable circumstances):

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1)(the following favorable circumstances) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence are significant in that the Defendants were engaged in beer World Cup, which is dangerous things between the Defendants, and were injured.

On the other hand, the fact of crime is recognized as a contingency.