제작물대금청구
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked, and
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company that produces gold in the form of gold. The Defendant is a company that directly produces gold orders from the U.S. companies or delivers them by requesting the Plaintiff, etc. to produce them.
B. 1) The Defendant requested the Plaintiff to produce gold and paid the price thereof as follows (hereinafter “instant gold production contract”).
) On June 3, 2013, No. 1 30-G 20, 30-P 30-N 2, 30-P 2, 30-N 2, 30-N 2, 30-N 2, 30-N 1, 30-N 2, 30-N 2, 30-N 2, 30-N 36, 30-N 2, 30-N 36, 30, 200, 30-N 2, 30-N 1, 306, 30-N 2, 306, 30-N 2, 305, 306, 30-N 36, 205, 305, 206-N 36, 305, 205, 2013.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant gold production contract.” However, the Plaintiff failed to complete the production of the said gold bullion, and “B,” upon receipt of each of the foregoing set-off Nos. 2, 3 gold punishment, and the first gold punishment, which the Plaintiff was produced by the Plaintiff, and delivered to the Defendant after completion of the production.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2 through 5, Eul evidence 4, 5, and 6 shall be included, if any, below.