A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 500,000,00, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

피고인들은 2019. 2. 4. 18:30경부터 같은 날 19:00경까지 부산 연제구 D에 있는 E 휴게실에서, 화투 20장을 이용하여 5장씩 3패로 나눈 후 패를 하나씩 선택하도록 한 다음, 각 패의 5장 중 3장의 합계로 10, 20, 30을 만든 후, 나머지 두 장의 끝수를 더한 수가 가장 높은 패를 선택한 사람이 이기는 방법으로 약 10회에 걸쳐 도금 합계 9만 원으로 속칭 ‘도리짓고땡’ 도박을 함께 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Confiscation (Defendant A) Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 2 and (2) of the Criminal Act (defendant B and C);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the order of provisional payment;

1. The sentencing criteria are not applicable since the sentencing criteria should be sentenced to a fine. 2. The sentencing criteria should be determined as ordered by taking into account the gambling time, size, the same kind of crime power, the degree of reflectability, etc.