A A Fines 3,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 6,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 2,00,000 won.

1. No person who has obtained the status of stay that makes it impracticable for a foreigner to engage in job-seeking activities shall arrange or solicit the employment of foreigners as a business;

Nevertheless, on February 6, 2017, the Defendant decided to allow three persons, such as M-F (F), Cambodia, G (G), and Cambodia (H) with a short-term visit (C-3) qualification not eligible for employment status in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, to pack and transport agricultural products in Company I, and to receive KRW 5,000 per person under the fee.

As a result, the defendant arranged the employment of foreigners who have the status of stay that is unable to engage in employment activities as a business.

2. No defendant B shall arrange or solicit the employment of foreigners who have sojourn status that prevents them from engaging in job-seeking activities as a business;

Nevertheless, on February 6, 2017, the Defendant, at the J and the 2nd K Office located in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, to ensure that two persons, such as the Philippines L (L) and the Switzerland M (M), who are qualified to live with the visit that does not fall under the status of sojourn eligible for employment, are engaged in packing and transporting agricultural products in the company I on the same day, and received KRW 5,000 per person as a fee.

As a result, the defendant arranged the employment of foreigners who have the status of stay that is unable to engage in employment activities as a business.

3. No foreigner C shall arrange as a business the permission to change his/her workplace, or the employment of foreigners who do not obtain additional permission;

Nevertheless, on February 6, 2017, the Defendant, at the N-si in Gwangju-si, and the O-O office located in the fourth-story, agreed to receive 5,000 won per person per fee, per non-professional employment (E-9) who is qualified for non-professional employment (E-9) without obtaining permission to change the place of work.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged the employment of foreigners who did not obtain the change of the work place as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1..