On July 4, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months by imprisonment with labor for a special injury at the District Court of the Republic of Korea on July 4, 2018, and was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of two years by July 12, 2018, and had a total of four times of violence.

On June 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 09:00, on the front of the Government of the Republic of Korea around 09:00, on the ground that the Victim C (48 tax) was fluording down a fluoral disease, which is a dangerous thing in the Libya, and caused the victim’s hair to tear to the extent that the victim could have his head cut down to the extent that 3rd of the head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Previous convictions: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, investigation report (related trials, confirmation of the same kind of force), previous convictions and results of confirmation of dispositions, and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Act on the Reduction of Small Amount of Punishment was when the Defendant was the principal who was in danger of the victim’s head. As a result, the victim did not have a large amount of blood transfusion due to the rear side of the head, which is the body’s head, and was taken by the victim at the time of requesting the assistance of the neighboring convenience store, and the blood trace flown out from the head of the body is surrounding the entire neck. As such, the method of the instant crime is blick and its risk is high, and the result of the instant crime is also unreasonable. Thus, the illegality is high.

In particular, the Defendant was indicted in this court on April 11, 2018 for committing the instant crime under the condition that he was tried and sentenced to the said case and again committed the instant crime under the designation of the date. In light of the criminal records as seen above, the Defendant’s normative consciousness is considerably lacking.