Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years after the judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 20, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On December 13, 2019, at around 00:47, the Defendant driven CW125 Obaba while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.136% of alcohol level 0.136% in the 3km section from the front of the restaurant where it is impossible to know the trade name in the red school of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of a survey report on actual condition and the control of drinking driving;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history records, repeated statements, and application of a summary order under statutes of one copy of the summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; the degree of blood alcohol concentration; the fact that the accused does not repeat a crime; the fact that the driven vehicle is erroneous and boom; and other various factors of sentencing, including the age, family, occupation, criminal record and the environment of the accused;