교통사고처리특례법위반
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a Crane car on March 17, 2013; (b) while driving the said car parked on the street in front of the Seo-gu Incheon 801-1, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon at around 801-1, and (c) had a duty of care to accurately operate the evise and operate the speed and brakes so as to prevent any accident; (d) however, despite the duty of care to prevent any accident due to the failure to operate the evise, without accurately operating the evise system, and rapid operation of the evise device without operating the evise system, the Defendant frane the said car beyond the evise boundary of the said car; and (c) caused the injury to the victim E, the victim E, the F, and the victim G favorable, and as a result, the victim suffered from the injury to the victim Evise 2, including the evisevis 8 necessary treatment.
However, this is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be discussed against the victim's express intent under Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. The traffic accident agreement submitted by the defendant on July 17, 2013, and
9. According to the written agreement submitted on April 1, 200, it is recognized that the above victims do not want the punishment of the defendant any longer after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.