2. The judgment of the Defendants led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, agreed with the victims of the instant fraud, and Defendant B was the first offender, etc. favorable to the Defendants.

However, the so-called "the crime of fraud of real estate" is highly likely to be subject to criticism as a crime that causes significant social harm by massing a number of victims. Defendant A actually planned and directed the instant fraudulent act while operating the planning real estate business entity, and the amount of the Defendants acquired by deception through the instant fraudulent act is large, as well as the degree of the Defendants' participation, comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions, such as the amount of wages that Defendant A did not pay to its workers, the amount of wages that Defendant A did not pay to its workers, the age, character and conduct, the environment, the motive and circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that

3. In conclusion, the defendants' appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the defendants' appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, the defendant is an employee of the above state AM from June 11, 2010 to December 31, 2010.

The portion of "234,634,427 won in aggregate of the amount in arrears of 153 workers, as stated in the attached Table of Crimes, including the amount of 1,66,666 won in November 201, and the amount of 2,50,000 won in December 2010, as well as 4,166,666 won in aggregate of the amount in arrears of 153 workers, shall be an employee of the said State from August 9, 2010 to December 31, 2010."

AR AS of retired workers is 483,870 won for August 2010, and September 2010.