On December 26, 2015, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the police officer was able to take care of his name unexploited, and took care of C’s faces, and took care of C’s face to take care of C, thereby hindering C’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public safety and order. The Defendant interfered with C’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public safety and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and damaged photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

2. A fine of one million won to be suspended;

3. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

4. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1248, Apr. 1, 2006);