beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.10.08 2015고정1670

대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등

Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Personal Information Protection Act, etc. at the Cheongju District Court, which became final and conclusive on June 13, 2014.

The Defendant operated a TM (M marketing office) office in which the phone call number was changed from the office B and the second floor office of his own Government to “C” and the name of the nominal owner would post a telephone to solicit a unregistered card loan.

The Defendant, at the above office, had employed telemabs, solicited card loans to the nominal owner using an off-to-land call where the phone number changed, and had the intent to run loan brokerage business in the form of acquiring personal information of the nominal owner and providing it to a third party.

1. A person who intends to engage in credit business or credit brokerage business in violation of the Registration of Credit Business and Protection of Financial Users Act shall register with the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan Autonomous City Mayor, Do Governor, or Special Self-Governing Province Governor

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with the head of the office D, opened a card loan brokerage office office without registration from August 19, 2013 to August 27, 2013, the Defendant selected a person to receive an off-to-face card loan brokerage office in order to conduct credit card brokerage services, and then entered the personal information acquired in this process into the “F site” operated by the “E” and had the title holder obtain credit card loans using this information.

2. No personal information shall be provided to a third party without obtaining consent from a subject of information on the protection of personal information;

Nevertheless, the Defendant conspired with D to receive approximately 18 million won of personal information of “G and telephone number: H” acquired by the urine in collusion with D during the period referred to in the preceding paragraph, and input into a “F” site that can be linked by E with other E.