When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 6, 2015, the Defendant reported that there was a time limit for taxi charges in front of the "D convenience store" located in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, and demanded F to pay the taxi charges and return home, the security guards belonging to the Goyang Police Station E box called to the site, and f to take care of her hand among the f, her face, her face, her body by hand, her f’s body, and her f’s f’s f’s body by hand, and her f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s bage.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and patrol duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement of the witness F and H in the fifth public trial record;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the choice of a fine [the defendant is relatively old and a primary offender, and the degree of assault is not much serious, etc., the defendant selected a fine and determined the amount in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant]

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.