beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.06.27 2014고정305

사문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant took part in the above lawsuit as Plaintiff D’s attorney in Busan District Court case No. 2010Gahap14585, which is a claim for damages between Plaintiff D and Defendant E, as the two parties’ legal representative. Since the above lawsuit was terminated on March 16, 201 as the withdrawal of lawsuit was terminated on three occasions by the absence of both parties, the Defendant did not have the authority as the legal representative of the above case.

Nevertheless, the Defendant asserted that D, the Defendant’s father, who was the Defendant’s father, agreed that D had agreed 2 billion won as consolation money upon termination of de facto marital relationship with G, and that D had a document to verify the facts related to D and E’s trial records, with the knowledge that there was a document to verify the facts related to D and E’s trial records without the consent of D, to peruse and copy the trial records of the above case No. 2010Ga14585.

1. On July 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for the perusal of the records of trial in Busan District Court located in the Doo-dong, Busan District Court; and (b) acted as if delegated by D, who requested D to submit D’s power of attorney from a public official in terms of his name; and (c) signed D’s signature in the letter of delegation form after stating “A”, “E”, “H”, “H”, and “D”, “the name column of the delegated person,” and “D” in the name column of the delegating person’s name.

For the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations without authority.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as stated in Paragraph 1, exercised the right of representation in a forged D’s name as if it was duly formed by a public official who is not aware of the forgery with the above Busan District Court’s civil case, without knowledge of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement 1.1.