However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 22:40 on December 8, 2013, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.), at the main point of the “E” in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as the damage of the victim’s character, which requires medical treatment for about 10 days, on the ground that the drinking value is unsured. In addition, the Defendant collected the cryp, which is a dangerous object, and collected the cryp, which is a dangerous object, and collected the cryp in which the cryp, which is contained, was put on the left end of the victim.

2. Around 00:20 on December 9, 2013, the Defendant, at the convenience store, deemed that there had been a deficit in selling drinking and tobacco to the Defendant’s children at the same time, and at that point, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business by bringing about about 30 minutes to the victim H (Nam, 34) who is an employee, with a large interest of “dying why he would drink or she would drink,” thereby interfering with the victim’s convenience store business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A H statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographic image records, such as site;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;