When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is engaged in agriculture in B in Naju City.

No person shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities.

Nevertheless, on June 18, 2018, the Defendant employed 9 foreigners who did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities, such as the entry in the list of crimes in the attached Table, as employees, in a dry field located in B1 (Visa exemption) in Naju City, by determining 50,00 won per day of the status of stay 21 (Visa exemption) that is not eligible for job-seeking activities, and employed 9 foreigners who did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written accusation against an immigration offender;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the certificate of foreign employment and written review;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 18 (3) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.