2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant are children of the network D (Death on February 6, 2013), and E is the husband of the network D.

B. The registration of the Cheongju District Court on February 19, 2013 and the registration of transfer of ownership was completed on February 6, 2013 on the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) owned by the network D due to inheritance due to consultation and division as the receipt of No. 19654 on February 19, 2013.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1 and 2 evidence (including paper numbers)

2. The assertion and determination Plaintiffs asserted that the agreement on the division of inherited property, which set the period to the Defendant for the apartment of this case under the condition that the Defendant supports C, was between E, the Plaintiffs, and the Defendant, who were the heir of the network D, but did not perform the obligation of the Defendant to support C, and therefore, the said agreement on division of inherited property is revoked.

On the other hand, as shown in the plaintiffs' assertion that there was such an agreement among the deceased's inheritors at the time of the division of inherited property, each statement of Gap's evidence Nos. 3 through 8 (including paper numbers), witness E's testimony, and the plaintiff's newspaper result of this court's plaintiff Eul in light of Eul's evidence No. 3, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.