도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On October 19, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 27, 2016. However, on June 7, 2017, the same court was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for the same crime, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 21, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 5, 2019.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a B rocketing or other car.
On February 20, 2020, the defendant operated the above car on February 21, 2020, which led to the progress of the national highways of Yong-gun, Samho-gu, Samho-ho National Highway from the Young-si to the booming area.
At the time, it is a road of three-lanes in which the central separation cost is installed. In such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving service with the direction and method of direction and direction of traffic facility water by accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol content 0.103% by neglecting this, the Defendant, while driving the said vehicle, did not take necessary measures after destroying the non-repairable property of repair cost, such as shocking the part on the day adjacent to the three-lanes by occupational negligence of driving the said vehicle, and shocking large street lamps installed in the centralized Separation Zone with the part on the front part of the said vehicle in front of the said vehicle.
2. Around 21:00 on February 20, 2020, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.103% from the 3km section from the front line of Yongama to the national highway intermediate point of D national highways.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.