However, it is against the Defendants for 3 years from the date of the final judgment.

1. Defendant B, at around 02:00 on January 3, 2013, at the main point of “F” located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si E, the Defendant left the victim’s head one time by taking the victim’s head into account a small-scale disease, which is a dangerous object on the table of the victim and his body, while playing fighting with the victim and his body, and put about two weeks of the victim’s face in drinking.

2. Defendant A, at the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph (1), Defendant A, at the Defendant’s place, was assaulted from the victim B, and the victim was able to fluorize the head of the victim, on the ground of the fluor’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the tables, and caused approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Each police statement to H, I, J, and K;

1. A H statement;

1. A copy of each medical record, a certificate of medical record, and a medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., that the Defendants repented wrongs, that the Defendants agreed with each victim, that the Defendants’ damage recovery or agreed with each victim, the age of the Defendants are written and that there is no record of criminal punishment, etc.)

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the same as the grounds for discretionary mitigation);