For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that convicted of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, but did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the establishment of a crime of taking property in breach of trust, the credibility of the statement of a crime of taking property in

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.