However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 29, 2016, Defendant B, and C violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault), on the ground that the victim D was said to be the victim D (18 years old), E (19 years old), and F (17 years old), and the victim D was said to be the victim D’s face at one time, and the victim E was flicked with her hand, and B was able to have the victim’s face at one time with her hand, and the victim’s hand flicked with the victim’s flick, and flicked with the victim’s flick, and flicked with the victim’s flick at one time with the victim’s face, and C flick with the victim’s hand, and flick with the victim’s hand, and flick with the victim’s hand, the victim’s flick, and flick with the victim’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted victims jointly with B and C.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at around 01:40 on the same day and at the same place as described in paragraph 1, and as mentioned above, while assaulting E at around 01:40 on the same day, the security guards belonging to the police station HH police station in the Gyeonggi Seo-gu, which was called to the scene after having received 112 reports have attempted to arrest the Defendant as a current offender, carried the I’s chest in hand, carried the 1’s chest in hand, taken the face one time as head, and the Defendant would not have any violent criminal origin among his family members.

The term "I" means "I's face face at one time in drinking."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

3. The Defendant damaged public goods at around 01:50 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the GH police station of the Gyeonggi Telecommunication Department located in J of the same day, and was arrested as a current offender for the same crime as described in the above paragraphs 1 and 2, and carried into the police box, and thereby, damaged goods used by public offices to cover KRW 300,000 of the repair cost by walking the entrance door of the police box at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect B or C by the police;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, F, and I;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Criminal facts;