특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. From February 23:00 on February 9, 2015, the Defendant driving CF vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.154% at a cF vehicle under the influence of alcohol, from the gynch distance from the gynch and the gynch distance from the gynch distance in Yangju-dong, Yangju-si, to the lower parking lot in Yangju-ro 139-ro 317, Yangju-si, Yangju-si.
2. The defendants are those engaged in driving cars in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, violation of the Road Traffic Act, injury resulting from special obstruction of performance of official duties, and damage to public goods;
The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was subject to drinking control from D’s latitude belonging to the Yangju Police Station, and refused to comply with the drinking control, and continued the street in front of the subdinal of the subdinal of the subdinal of the subdinal of Yangju City, 139, 317, from the subdinal of the subdinal of the subdinal of the subdinal of the subdinal of the subdinal of the subdinal.
At the time, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle at night has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the steering system, such as taking the front door and the surrounding area well, and accurately operating the steering gear and brakes.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the elementary school set up on the right side of the victim E(39 years of age) driving, which was going from the direction of the Suduk Station by negligence that caused damage to drinking control and obstructed turn to the left, and received the front part of the vehicle as the front part of the Defendant.
The Defendant continued to shoot the Defendant’s vehicle into the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which is an object dangerous to the front-hand part of the said vehicle patrol vehicle, while the two-way police station guard and the operation of a slope G (the age of 42) with a view to provoking the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was a dangerous object of the said front-hand part of the vehicle. In repeating the front-hand part, the said front-hand vehicle and the said front-hand patrol vehicle were shocked.
Accordingly, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence.