However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 28, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), on April 23, 2009, the Seoul Northern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of the same offense at the Seoul Northern District Court, and on June 11, 2009, issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a result of the same offense at the Seoul Northern District Court, and on April 11, 2009, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving regulations two times or more by being sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment

On October 24, 2017, around 00:34, the Defendant driven Bone Star Frops under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.083% alcohol concentration from the 3km section from Gangdong-gu Seoul, Seoul to the 788 front road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1348, Jan. 2, 2009; Supreme Court Decision 200Da1348, Feb. 1, 2

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 62-2 (2) of the Social Service Order Act, and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection;