However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 30, 2018, the Defendant who injured the Victim C is a victim C (46 years of age) while drinking alcohol together with friendly E in the “OOO cafeteria cafeteria” located in Sinpo-si D around 01:10 on May 30, 2018.

For the reason that the victim said that he was “,” he was aware of the victim’s breath’s breath with her hand, and was 6 times the victim’s face face by drinking, and was inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the victim’s breath, on the face of the treatment days.

2. Interference with the performance of official duties, and injury Defendant: (a) around 01:5 on May 30, 2018, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) of the above Article, “for customers”

In light of the aforementioned facts, while the police officers assigned to the F police box of the Southern Bapo Police Station, G Ha, etc., who had been dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of 112, and identified the circumstances of the instant case against the said C, he she saw the said C as “I see if I want to see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, and I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see, I see,

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim G, such as the impairment of the head of a part requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, E, and I;

1. C Police Statements;

1. A photograph of damaged part of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical treatment;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances as seen below): The defendant suffered injury upon a person who became a vision under the influence of alcohol, and the circumstances leading to the instant crime committed by the police officer who received a report and dispatched the police officer.