Judgment

Although there are the statements of D, the injury diagnosis certificate issued by D, and the medical examination fee for D as evidence to acknowledge the facts charged of this case, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records and pleadings of this case, it is difficult to believe D’s statement, and the injury diagnosis statement and the medical examination fee were made based on D’s statement. Thus, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged.

D The investigative agency stated to the effect that the defendant takes a bath to himself and takes a bath as a street store operated by him, plucking and plucking up things left to the floor, plucking up and plucking up uria, and has fash up side by the fash.

B. On the D’s diagnosis and treatment set, it is stated that the left 4th fingers exceeded, and that D had a left hand on the photographs submitted to the investigation agency, and taken photographs and photographs.

C. However, D did not appear as a witness in this court, and the Defendant plucked up the fourth hand to the right, rather than the left hand hand, and was treated for the second hand of the right hand, and now stated that the fourth hand of the right hand is off.

The above D’s above legal statement is difficult to be deemed to be confused with the location of multi-parent families after the lapse of the time.

D At the time of the instant case.