Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.

피고인은 2018. 8. 23. 17:05경 피해자 B(남, 54세)가 운행하는 택시를 타고 청주시 서원구 C에 있는 피고인이 운영하는 D 식당 앞에서 하차한 후 피해자가 피고인에게 택시 요금을 요구하자 피해자가 일부러 길을 멀리 돌아왔다는 생각에 화가 나, 위 식당에 있던 부엌칼(총 길이 38.5cm, 칼날 길이 27cm)을 가지고 나와 피해자에게 “너 하나 죽여도 내가 힘 있고 빽 있어서 괜찮다”라고 말하며 찌를 듯이 위협하고, 계속해서 위 식당에 있는 쇠파이프(길이 1m)를 들고 나와 “너 대갈빡 까버릴거야”라고 말하며 이를 수회 휘둘렀다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (Evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 10)

1. Relevant Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime; and (b) the Defendant again commits the instant crime despite the past record of having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the same crime; (c) in light of the weapon used by the Defendant, details of intimidation, and the circumstances of the crime, the nature of the crime is very poor; and (d) the Defendant’s unfavorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant’s failure to receive a letter from the victim, and reflects the perception of the crime; and (e) other favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, the Defendant’s health condition is not good; (b) the victim’s body is not directly damaged; and (c) the risk of recidivism, etc.,