2. As follows, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was written or added “from 20 to 4 pages 1 to 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance,” was used as follows, and the 4th 2 to 3th 2 of the judgment, “this court has rendered a significant fact” in the column for recognition. A judgment of conviction (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) was rendered, and that judgment became final and conclusive on June 13, 2019.

[No evidence exists" in the first instance judgment of the Supreme Court Decision 2016Da2790, 6186, Daegu District Court Decision 2018No146, Supreme Court Decision 2018Do1090]. The following is added. According to the evidence 2-2 of the first instance judgment, the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement), including embezzlement of KRW 305,44,360, Jun. 30, 2016, which included the above embezzlement of KRW 305,44,360, and embezzlement of KRW 305,44,360, which was found guilty, the court below's Daegu District Court Decision 2018No146, the Supreme Court Decision 2018Do11090). The court below's portion of the judgment of the first instance judgment is without merit as to the scope of the amount of joint security interest or the amount of compensation under Article 8 (3).