손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s 18 tons wing truck for Korean commercial use (hereinafter “instant truck”).
2) Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant C”) was a company for the purpose of manufacturing and selling vehicles freezing equipment, parts manufacturing and selling, and manufacturing E-vehicle air conditioners (hereinafter “instant air conditioners”).
3) Defendant B corporation (hereinafter “Defendant B”)
(B) On July 9, 2017, a company engaged in the wholesale and retail business of automobile goods, and installed and attached the instant air conditioner on the instant cargo vehicle. (B) Around November 3, 2017, around 15:40, the Cheongju-si driving of the instant cargo vehicle, and driving the instant cargo vehicle and driving the front road of the Cheongju-si in front of the Cheongju-si in front of the Cheongju-si in front of the Cheongju-si. However, the instant fire on the instant cargo vehicle (hereinafter “instant fire”).
(c) As a result of the appraisal by the National Scientific Investigation Institute, the National Institute of Scientific Investigation investigated the cause of the instant fire on November 21, 2017 and November 30, 2017. As a result, the said Institute concluded that “it is likely that the instant air conditioners might have damaged the air conditioners of the instant air conditioners, which pass through the left body at the bottom of the closure of the instant cargo vehicle, and that the air conditioners of the instant air conditioners could have caused the fall.” 【Nos. 1 through 6, 8, and 9 (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply) on the ground of recognition
each entry, the purport of the whole pleading
2. The Plaintiff’s allegation that the fire occurred due to the defect of the ship that connects the main body of the air conditioner of this case with the outdoor equipment.
The Defendants are manufacturers who manufacture, process, and supply the air conditioners and the air conditioners of this case. Thus, they are manufacturers who manufacture and sell defective goods without safety and durability pursuant to Articles 3(1) and 5 of the Product Liability Act, and are jointly and severally liable for damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the fire in this case pursuant to Articles 750 and 760 of the Civil Act.