2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. Basic facts 1) The Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment on October 5, 2018 in the Daegu District Court 2018 Godan3179 in the following criminal facts against the Plaintiff, the term “public official qualification,” and the term “indecent act by compulsion,” the term of imprisonment on October 5, 2018, the term of suspension of execution two years, the term of order to attend sexual assault treatment 40 hours, and the term of restriction on employment. The above judgment became final and conclusive around that time (the term “Defendant” refers to the Defendant, and the term “C” refers to the Plaintiff’s qualification as public official. 1. The Defendant is not the Gu office hygiene and the public official.

On May 2018, at around 11:00 on the end of the end of the 2018, the Defendant presented the cafeteria access certificate to the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seo-gu Office as a public official witness, and inspected whether the Defendant fulfilled the sanitary management obligation by entering the Mag-gu office shop.

Accordingly, the defendant misrepresented the public official's qualification and exercised his authority ex officio.

2. Indecent acts by compulsion;

A. On June 5, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime around 20:40 on June 5, 2018, and around 20:40 on June 5, 2018, the Defendant stated that the victim had a sense of care for the victim while drinking alcohol together with the victim at “E” shop operated by the victim C (the age of 53) as stated in paragraph (1), and that the victim was able to talk with the Defendant, and that the son was fried by the Defendant, who was fried by the Defendant, and was fried by the Defendant, and was fried by the Defendant, and was friened by the Defendant. However, the Defendant, on his own hand, friened the face of the victim and fried by the Defendant, and friened by coercioning the victim by force.

B. On June 5, 2018, around 22:21, the Defendant committed the crime, around June 5, 2018, referred to in paragraph (1), “Around June 22:21, 2018, the Defendant would not have a kis in the house if the kis are leaving the house” against the victim’s head of the Marins shop shop operated by the victim as stated in paragraph (1). The victim voluntarily voluntarily withdraws the kis where the Defendant kisck even kisc in the bucks of the Defendant.”