도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On May 2, 1995, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by the road management authority by operating the Defendant’s employees as loaded with freight exceeding 11.5 tons in excess of 10 tons of the limited storage of C vehicle, on the front side of the main national road management office located at the Young-dong Highway (5:09).
2. In the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) Decided October 28, 2010, the Constitutional Court decided that "where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the portion of the fine under Article 83 (1) 2 shall also be imposed on the corporation, which shall be retroactively null and void pursuant to the main sentence of Article 47 (3) of the Constitutional Court Act, applied by the public prosecutor to the facts charged in this case."
3. According to the conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of the judgment of the defendant is publicly announced pursuant to