However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 01:33 on December 31, 2018, the Defendant, having received 112 report that “I will not shoulder the male sex” of “A” who is an employee of her mother in the Round, thereby openly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim, E of the lusium affiliated with the Made Zone D, and the Defendant, who was an employee of the lusur, who was a lusur of the lusur, a lusur, a lusur of the lusarf, the victim’s bitch bitch, the lusar bitch of the Korean police force, the police flusor, and the flusor,” who is an employee of the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, obstructed the body of the Defendant, i.e., when he was asked to voluntarily move to a police box from E due to the suspicion of insulting the police box E, as described in paragraph 1, at the time and place of the obstruction of performance of official duties.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported case by E 112 police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A witness statement in the C preparation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on a police officer dispatched by the defendant is poor, but there is no record

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;