When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) purchased game money by accessing the Internetnet Marnet Marb website within the net city B, 2012; and (b) used the cell phone of the victim D who made a female-friendly job offering in the same room; and (c) intended to pay the money.

The Defendant entered the victim’s resident registration number and the victim’s mobile phone number that he had been aware of before, and requested a certification number, and identified the certification number that the victim had been transmitted to the victim’s mobile phone between the victim and the victim’s unaware, and paid 100,000 won of the purchase price of the game money by entering the said certification number in the settlement column of the

On March 1, 2012, the Defendant settled KRW 100,000 by the same method, KRW 130,000,000 in the same manner, KRW 130,000 in the same manner, and KRW 70,000 in the same manner on March 4, 2012

Accordingly, the defendant obtained a total of 400,000 won of property benefits by inputting information without authority on the net pool.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Written petition of D;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on the claim of mobile phone charges, internal investigation reports, communication confirmation data replies, replys to each communication data, reports on investigation results, and criminal investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.