However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On September 10, 2015, the Defendant is an overseas Korean (F-4) who entered the Republic of Korea with a visa.

피고인은 2015. 8. 7. 경 키 르기 스스 탄 비쉬 켁 아크 훈 바 예 브 35번 가의 키 르기 스스 탄 대한민국 대사관에서, 일명 ‘B’ 라는 브로커에게 6,000 달러를 주기로 약속하고 피고인의 어머니가 이른바 ‘ 고려 인’ 이 아님에도 ‘ 고려 인’ 인 것처럼 위조된 출생 증명서를 교부 받은 다음, 사증 발급 신청서를 제출하면서 위와 같이 위조된 허위 출생 증명서를 첨부 서류로 제출하여 외국 국적 동포에게만 발급되는 재외동포 (F-4) 사증을 신청하여 발급 받았다.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the above "B", filed an application for a visa with the public official in charge of issuing visas belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea by fraudulent means at the same time as interfering with the legitimate performance of duties by the public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Articles printed out of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police; and

1. Copy of the police statement made to D;

1. Status of individual entry or departure;

1. Register of reported foreign nationality Koreans' residence in the Republic of Korea;

1. Application documents for visa issuance;

1. Application of the relevant statutes to the visa issuance application;

1. Articles 137 and 30 (Interference with the performance of official duties by fraudulent means) of the Criminal Act relevant to the crime, Article 94 subparagraph 3 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 7-2 subparagraph 2 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Do134, Apr. 1, 20