When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 11, 2017, at around 06:02, the Defendant kept the 1st floor of C-free shop logistics warehouse located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Incheon, and caused a theft of KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000 in the market value of the victim D, and KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of a fine for the crime (the following circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing shall be considered);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Scope of punishment: At least 50,000 won, but not exceeding ten million won;

2. The sentencing criteria shall not apply since the decision of sentencing was made: The defendant, who is a fine of two million won, does not know well even though he is in the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and the defendant seems to go against the crime of this case by failing to meet the reasonable impulse, and the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is not significant, and the defendant seems to be faithfully receiving protection and observation in accordance with the guidance and supervision of the protection observation office, although the defendant is currently under the probation period, there is no criminal history other than the above probation period, and the relationship between his parent and a female living together with his family appears to be obvious as a result of the investigation of the judgment, and considering the above circumstances, the defendant is under short-term confinement on the ground that he did not commit the crime of this case, even though he was under the probation period.