If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is the Director General of the Secretariat of the Gyeongbuk-do Party B, and C is the Director General of the Organization of the Gyeongbuk-do Party B.

C was hospitalized at the hospital around June 201 of the same month while in charge of the intra-party election affairs around June 2012, upon request from D, who is the Director General of the Public Relations Office of the Gyeongdo Party, the ID and password of C e-mail (E) were informed D.

During that day, the above D had to go fast from June 23, 2012, and upon requesting the Defendant to conduct election-related affairs in the party, the Defendant informed the Defendant of the ID and password of the C’s e-mail, and the Defendant, at the office of the party Gyeongbuk-do Party located in the Sinsan City F at around 13:18 on the same day, entered the ID and password of the C’s e-mail into the above website by using the computer in its location, and then put the w.krea.com with C’s e-mail ID and password into the above website.

At the time, the above C and D allowed the Defendant to access the above e-mail and search the e-mail only with respect to the search and adjustment of the data sent by the candidates for registration to C in connection with the party election, but the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, perused the e-mail content beyond the permitted access authority and infringed on

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to C, G, H, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (Statement of Telephone Communications for Witnesses);

1. Article 72 (1) 1 and Article 48 (1) of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion of the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant’s act was inevitably made available for perusal of e-mail in order to discover and detect the leakage of a roster of party members. This is due to the work under Article 20 of the Criminal Act